Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Telematika is a periodical scientific publication that focuses on information technology and computer science in the form of a collection/accumulation of new knowledge, empirical observations or research results, and the development of new ideas or proposals. Some sub-fields of science that are the focus of computer science include:

1. Artificial Intelligence,

2. Signal Processing,

3. Software Engineering,

4. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition,

5. Computational and Mathematical Theory,

6. Decision Support Systems,

7. Computer Science (Other)

 

Section Policies

Article

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

  • Reviewers receive a double-blind review (without the identity of the author) from the section editor or editorial secretariat. If not by their competence, the reviewer has the right to reject the text and recommend it to other reviewers who are more competent
  • One reviewer at least reviews one script and one script must be reviewed at least by two reviewers
  • Reviewers review the manuscript from the aspect of quality and substance of writing (not the grammar of the script), which includes the renewal, authenticity, usefulness, and validity of citations and bibliography.
  • Reviewers review the manuscript in 1 to 2 weeks

 

Open Access Policy

Hak akses seluruh konten publikasi jurnal ini bersifat open access untuk tujuan non-komersial [lihat ketentuan hak cipta].

Jurnal Telematika dibawah lisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

 

Publication Ethic and Malpractice Statement

Part A: Publication and authorship

  1. All texts sent will go through a strict peer-review process by at least two reviewers who are experts in the field.
  2. The review process is a blind review.
  3. The factors taken into account in the review are relevance, significance, originality, legibility and language.
  4. Decisions include acceptance, acceptance with revisions, or rejection.
  5. If the author is asked to revise and resubmit the submission, there is no guarantee that the revised submission will be accepted.
  6. Rejected articles will not be reviewed.
  7. Acceptance of manuscripts is limited by legal requirements such as those that apply in the validity period due to copyright infringement and plagiarism.

 

Part B: Author's responsibility

The author must state that their manuscript is their original work.

  1. The author must state that the manuscript has not been published elsewhere.
  2. The author must state that the manuscript is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere.
  3. Authors must participate in the peer-review process.
  4. The author is obliged to provide corrections or correction of errors.
  5. All Authors mentioned on paper must significantly contribute to this research.
  6. The author must state that all data in the text is genuine
  7. The author must notify the Editor of any conflict of interest.
  8. The author must identify all sources used in making the manuscript.
  9. Authors must report errors that they found in the mass media published to the Editor.

 

Part C: Reviewer responsibilities

Reviewers must keep all information about the manuscript and treat it as confidential information.

  1. Reviews must be done objectively, without personal criticism from authors Reviewer must express their views clearly with supporting arguments
  2. The reviewer must identify the relevant published work that has not been quoted by the author.
  3. The reviewer must also call the attention of the Editor in Chief for substantial or overlapping similarities between the manuscripts being considered and other publications that have personal knowledge.
  4. Reviewers may not review the manuscript where they have a conflict of interest due to a relationship, relationship, or competitive, collaborative, or other relationship with any writer, company or institution related to the newspaper.

 

Part D: editor's responsibility

  1. The editor has full responsibility and authority to reject/accept an article.
  2. The editor is responsible for the content and overall quality of the publication.
  3. The editor must always consider the needs of writers and readers when trying to improve publications.
  4. The editor must guarantee the quality of the text and the integrity of academic records.
  5. The editor must make corrections if needed.
  6. The editor must have a clear picture of the sources of research funding.
  7. Editors must base their decisions solely as an interest, authenticity, clarity, and relevance of the paper with the scope of the publication.
  8. Editors should not reverse their decisions or cancel the previous editor for no serious reason.
  9. The editor must maintain the anonymity of reviewers.
  10. Editors must ensure that all research material they publish is by accepted ethical guidelines.
  11. Editors may only accept scripts if they are sure enough.
  12. Editors must act if they suspect that they made a mistake, whether a paper was published or not published, and made all reasonable efforts to survive in obtaining a resolution to the problem.
  13. Editors may not reject papers based on suspicion; they should have proof of the error.
  14. Editors should not allow conflicts of interest between staff, writers, reviewers and board members.

 

Archiving Policy





Indexed by:

   
   

Jurnal Telematika

ISSN 2442-4528 (online) | ISSN 1979-925X (print)
Published by : Universitas Amikom Purwokerto
Jl. Let. Jend. POL SUMARTO Watumas, Purwonegoro - Purwokerto Telp (0281) 623321 Fax (0281) 621662
Email: telematika@amikompurwokerto.ac.id

 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0